Dotloop now available as Member Benefit (Plus LTO offer thru March 31)

Bridge Association of REALTORS® Forms Now Live in Dotloop Under Free Member Benefit Program

Great news! You now have access to dotloop, a complete end-to-end translation management solution. You get up to 25 transactions (“loops”) as a member benefit. Plus, you’ll find all local and state association forms available natively in the platform. To take advantage of this new member benefit, sign up for your free dotloop account​ today and connect the Bridge Association of REALTORS® forms library, here's how...

For a limited time — now through March 31, 2022 — receive 25% off the purchase of a dotloop Premium sub​scription.

Save 25% today

C.A.R. news release: Housing affordability by ethnicity

For release:

March 24, 2022

Housing affordability for all Californians worsened amid skyrocketing home price growth during pandemic, C.A.R. reports

Black and Latino households who can afford to buy are half that of whites, illustrating wide racial homeownership divide

• About one-fourth of all Californians could afford to purchase the $786,750 statewide median-priced home in 2021, down a couple of percentage points from 2020.

• By ethnic groups, more than one-third of white California households, and less than one in five Black and Latino California households could afford the same median-priced home, while 40 percent of Asians could buy a median-priced home.

• A minimum annual income of $144,400 was needed to make monthly payments of $3,610, including principal, interest, and taxes on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at a 3.16 percent interest rate.

LOS ANGELES (March 24) – Housing affordability deteriorated in 2021 for all California ethnic home-buying groups, largely due to double-digit home price growth that occurred during the COVID-19 crisis, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) https://www.car.org/ said today.

Twenty-six percent of all Californians earned the minimum income needed to purchase a home in 2021, down from 28 percent in 2020. At the same time, housing affordability for white/non-Hispanic households fell from 38 percent in 2020 to 34 percent in 2021. Seventeen percent of Black and Latino households could afford the median-priced home in 2021, down from 19 percent and 20 percent in 2020, respectively. The significant difference in housing affordability for Black and Latino households illustrates the homeownership gap and wealth disparity for communities of color, which could worsen as rates rise further in 2022.

Housing was more affordable for Asians, with 40 percent of Asian homebuyers who could afford the median-priced home in 2021, down from 43 percent in 2020, according to C.A.R.’s Housing Affordability Index.

Multimedia:

• Motiongraphic: https://www.car.org/marketdata/data/haitraditional/haiethnicity

• Slides: https://car.sharefile.com/share/view/s2784b9e2115641c28fea6a434300ebdb

Despite interest rates remaining low and many employees having the flexibility to work from home, gaps in housing affordability did not improve in 2021. The housing affordability gap between Blacks and the overall population in California remained virtually unchanged at 9.2 percentage points in 2020 and 9.3 percentage points in 2021, while the gap for Hispanics/Latinos widened slightly from 8.3 percentage points in 2020 to 8.9 percentage points in 2021.

According to the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, the 2020 homeownership rate for all Californians was 56 percent, 64 percent for whites, 61 percent for Asians, 46 percent for Hispanics/Latinos and 37 percent for Blacks.

“Homeownership has an unparalleled ability to provide stability and economic security for working families and is vital to the health of our state and its citizens because it strengthens communities across California,” said C.A.R. President Otto Catrina. “Promoting access to homeownership is one way to close the racial wealth gap and foster economic equity for all Californians, and that’s why C.A.R. is committed to addressing ongoing fair housing and equity issues that persist in our state that have made it harder for Blacks, Latinos and other underserved communities to access and afford housing.”

Last year, three C.A.R.-sponsored bills and two other fair housing bills, which C.A.R. actively supported, were signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom. These laws include requiring implicit bias training for real estate professionals, bills designed to address the supply and affordability challenges that disparately impact people of color and a bill to address appraisal bias.

Additionally, in an effort to address California’s growing housing affordability crisis and racial homeownership divide, C.A.R. is partnering with nonprofit housing organizations to provide closing cost grants up to $10,000 for eligible first-time home buyers from an underserved community.

C.A.R.’s Housing Affordability Index (HAI) measures the percentage of households that can afford to purchase a median-priced, single-family home in California. C.A.R. also reports affordability indices for regions and select counties within the state. The index is considered the most fundamental measure of housing well-being for home buyers in the state.

A minimum annual income of $144,400 was needed to qualify for the purchase of a $786,750 statewide median-priced, existing single-family home in 2021. The monthly payment, including taxes and insurance on a 30-year, fixed-rate loan, would be $3,610, assuming a 20 percent down payment and an effective composite interest rate of 3.16 percent. The 2021 California median income for whites was $102,540, $116,060 for Asians, $71,120 for Hispanics/Latinos and $61,740 for Blacks — a more than $20,000 income gap between the overall population.

The affordability gap is especially stark in expensive counties like San Francisco, where a median-priced home of $1,825,000 was only affordable for 10 percent of Black households, 17 percent of Latino households, 24 percent of Asian households and 37 percent of white households.

Compared with California, 38 percent of the nation’s Black households could afford to purchase a $353,600 median-priced home in 2021, which required a minimum annual income of $64,800 to make monthly payments of $1,620, while 58 percent of white households could afford the same home.

Key points from the 2021 Housing Affordability by Ethnicity report include:

• Of the major regions for which C.A.R. tracks affordability by ethnicity, the affordability gap between Black and the overall population in California in 2021 was the largest in Sacramento and Solano, with each registering a 13-point gap. Other counties that had a double-digit affordability gap for Black households include Alameda (-11 points), San Francisco (-11 points), San Diego (-11 points), Contra Costa (-10 points), and Fresno (-10 points). Only Riverside County was more affordable for Black households compared to all Californians.

• San Bernardino (41 percent), Riverside (37 percent), and Kern counties (37 percent) were the most affordable areas for Black households, while San Bernardino (49 percent), Fresno and Solano (both at 40 percent) were the most affordable for Hispanics/Latinos.

• For Hispanic/Latino households, the affordability gap was the biggest in Orange (-9 points), San Diego (-9 points), and Ventura counties (-9 points), while the gap was the smallest in Riverside and San Joaquin (both at -2 points) and Fresno, Sacramento and Solano counties (all at -3 points),

• At an affordability index of 10 percent, Orange and San Francisco counties were the least affordable for Black households, while San Bernardino County was the most affordable at 41 percent.

• The least affordable county in 2021 for Hispanic/Latino homebuyers was Orange, and the most affordable was San Bernardino at 49 percent.

• For white and Asian households, Orange County was the least affordable with 25 percent and 22 percent, respectively, earning the minimum income required to buy a median-price home, while Kern was the most affordable at 56 percent for whites and 65 percent for Asians.

Leading the way…® in California real estate for more than 110 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with more than 217,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles

C.A.R. news release: Feb. home sales and price report

For release: March 15, 2022

California home sales edge higher in February amid geopolitical tensions and inflation uncertainty, C.A.R. reports

• Existing, single-family home sales totaled 424,640 in February on a seasonally adjusted annualized rate, down 4.5 percent from January and down 8.2 percent from February 2021.

• February’s statewide median home price was $771,270, up 0.7 percent from January and up 10.3 percent from February 2021.

• Year-to-date statewide home sales were down 8.3 percent in February.

LOS ANGELES (March 15) – Despite higher interest rates alongside geopolitical uncertainty caused by the Russia-Ukraine conflict, California’s housing market continued to maintain a solid sales pace even while the number of homes sold were lower than last year’s unusually strong market, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®(C.A.R.) said today. Infographic: https://www.car.org/Global/Infographics/2022-02-Sales-and-Price

Closed escrow sales of existing, single-family detached homes in California totaled a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 424,640 in February, according to information collected by C.A.R. from more than 90 local REALTOR® associations and MLSs statewide. The statewide annualized sales figure represents what would be the total number of homes sold during 2022 if sales maintained the February pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.

February’s sales pace was down 4.5 percent on a monthly basis from 444,540 in January and was down 8.2 percent from a year ago, when 462,720 homes were sold on an annualized basis. The year-over-year sales decrease was the eighth straight decline and the smallest in seven months.

“Despite higher mortgage rates, California’s housing market is holding up remarkably strong, with home prices reaccelerating, market competition growing and signs that the listings crunch is thawing,” said C.A.R. President Otto Catrina, a Bay Area real estate broker and REALTOR®. “Prospective buyers are taking advantage of still-low rates before they move higher and getting a jump on competition before the start of the spring homebuying season.”

California home prices continued to increase from the prior year, picking up momentum again after slowing down for eight consecutive months. The statewide median price inched up to $771,270 in February, up 0.7 percent from January’s $765,610 and up 10.3 percent from the $699,000 recorded in February 2021. The stronger-than-expected growth in the statewide median price is attributed partly to a change in the mix of sales toward homes in the million-dollar price range, as sales jumped in higher-priced regions such as the Central Coast and the San Francisco Bay Area.

“While home sales declined from both the previous month and year, February’s sales pace was still the second highest sales level for a February in the last 10 years and strong relative to pre-pandemic levels of 2018 and 2019,” said C.A.R. Vice President and Chief Economist Jordan Levine. “However, the invasion of Ukraine has created geopolitical headwinds and pushed up inflation up a notch, which may keep mortgage rates elevated and cause the housing market to retreat amid the uncertainty.”

At an index of 67 in February, C.A.R.’s monthly Consumer Housing Sentiment Index dropped 2 points from last month as consumers acknowledged the current market challenges and felt increasingly pessimistic about homebuying opportunities. Consumers who thought it was a “Good time to buy” dropped to 16 in February from 19 last month and from 28 points last year. Still, one in every four consumers are holding out hope that it will be easier to find a home in the next 12 months and nearly two in every three believe that home prices will rise over the same period of time.

Other key points from C.A.R.’s February 2022 resale housing report include:

• At the regional level, all major regions except the Central Valley recorded a decrease in sales on a year-over-year basis, but lower-priced areas continued to fare better than higher-priced areas in the Golden State. The Central Coast region had the sharpest decline of all regions, with sales in February dropping 16.3 percent from a year ago. To put things into perspective though, housing demand was abnormally strong early last year with sales in February 2021 surging 22.4 percent from the prior year. The San Francisco Bay Area and Southern California also experienced a double-digit or a near double-digit sales loss of -13.7 percent and -9.9 percent, respectively in February. Home sales in the Far North also dipped 8.5 percent, but the pace was slightly better than the aforementioned regions. The Central Valley was the only region with a sales gain in February, increasing 1.2 percent from a year ago.

• Over 70 percent of all counties tracked by C.A.R. experienced a dip in existing home sales from a year ago, with 24 counties declining more than 10 percent on a year-over-year basis. With many properties destroyed by the Dixie Fire last summer, Plumas had the largest decline of all counties in February, falling 62.1 percent from a year ago. Mariposa (-50.0 percent), Amador (-35.2 percent), and Mendocino (-32.7 percent) were three other counties in California that also experienced a sales drop of more than 30 percent last month. Counties with a sales decline from last year had an average decrease of -17.7 percent in February. Fourteen counties experienced a sales gain from last year, with Yuba (65.3 percent) surging the most, followed by Siskiyou (45.8 percent) and Sutter (31.9 percent).

• Home prices continued to grow in all major regions in the state, with all five posting double-digit year-over-year gains in their median price. The San Francisco Bay Area recorded the highest year-over-year price gain at a 15.9 percent increase, followed by the Central Valley (14.8 percent), Southern California (12.6 percent), the Far North (11.9 percent), and the Central Coast (10.1 percent).

• Despite slower price growth due to rising mortgage rates, home prices continued to increase across the state, with 24 California counties setting new record high median prices in February. All but three counties tracked by C.A.R. experienced an increase in their median price in February, with 38 of them surging by double-digits from a year ago. Santa Cruz had the biggest year-over-year price increase at 30.4 percent, followed by Glenn (29.1 percent) and Yolo (28.2 percent). Three counties registered a median price decline from last year, with Mono dropping the most at -30.8 percent, followed by Santa Barbara (-10.6 percent) and Mendocino (-4.8 percent).

· California’s Unsold Inventory Index (UII) rose in February as active listings climbed from January to the highest level in three months. February’s UII was 2.0 months and 2.1 months in February 2021. The index indicates the number of months it would take to sell the supply of homes on the market at the current rate of sales.

· The median number of days it took to sell a California single-family home was 9 days in February and 10 days in February 2021.

· C.A.R.’s statewide sales-price-to-list-price ratio* was 102.6 percent in February 2022 and 101.0 percent in February 2021.

· The statewide average price per square foot** for an existing single-family home remained elevated. February’s price per square foot was $392, up from $338 in February a year ago.

· The 30-year, fixed-mortgage interest rate averaged 3.76 percent in February, up from 2.81 percent in February 2021, according to Freddie Mac. The five-year, adjustable mortgage interest rate averaged 2.87 percent, compared to 2.83 percent in February 2021.

Note: The County MLS median price and sales data in the tables are generated from a survey of more than 90 associations of REALTORS® throughout the state and represent statistics of existing single-family detached homes only. County sales data are not adjusted to account for seasonal factors that can influence home sales. Movements in sales prices should not be interpreted as changes in the cost of a standard home. The median price is where half sold for more and half sold for less; medians are more typical than average prices, which are skewed by a relatively small share of transactions at either the lower end or the upper end. Median prices can be influenced by changes in cost, as well as changes in the characteristics and the size of homes sold. The change in median prices should not be construed as actual price changes in specific homes.

*Sales-to-list-price ratio is an indicator that reflects the negotiation power of home buyers and home sellers under current market conditions. The ratio is calculated by dividing the final sales price of a property by its last list price and is expressed as a percentage. A sales-to-list ratio with 100 percent or above suggests that the property sold for more than the list price, and a ratio below 100 percent indicates that the price sold below the asking price.

**Price per square foot is a measure commonly used by real estate agents and brokers to determine how much a square foot of space a buyer will pay for a property. It is calculated as the sale price of the home divided by the number of finished square feet. C.A.R. currently tracks price-per-square foot statistics for 50 counties.

Leading the way…® in California real estate for more than 110 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with more than 217,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.